WWE Hall of Famer Booker T recently addressed growing rumors surrounding WWE’s unique business arrangements with TNA Wrestling, lending credibility to reports that WWE holds the “first right of refusal” to acquire TNA if the promotion is ever put up for sale. Speaking on his “Hall of Fame” podcast, Booker T described the possibility as “very real,” emphasizing the ongoing partnership between WWE and TNA as the foundation for this strategic provision.

According to insider reports from the Wrestling Observer Newsletter and corroborated by multiple wrestling news outlets such as Wrestling Attitude and Wrestling Headlines, WWE’s current deal with TNA includes an option to purchase the company within a defined time frame. Crucially, WWE also retains the right of first refusal, meaning that if another buyer emerges with an offer for TNA, WWE can match that bid and secure the company themselves, effectively controlling any potential change in ownership[1][2][3].

This business arrangement echoes previous agreements WWE has executed with independent wrestling promotions in Europe, where WWE maintains influence over partner companies by ensuring any sale aligns with their broader strategic interests. A reliable WWE source cited by the Wrestling Observer explained this is designed not simply for an immediate takeover, but to maintain a strong, cooperative number two promotion within the United States wrestling market, thereby reinforcing wrestling’s overall TV value and market footprint[1][2].

Booker T reinforced this perspective in his podcast appearance. “WWE and TNA have been working together closely this year,” he said, “with talent exchanges and events that benefit both sides. Having that ‘first right’ means WWE can safeguard the business and ensure any future buyer won’t be a disruptive competitor.” Booker’s comments align with the reported intent to keep TNA as a viable and friendly partner, rather than allowing it to fall into rival hands who could challenge WWE’s position[Reference].

Inside wrestling circles, speculation about TNA’s future ownership has intensified amid rumors of interest from high-profile buyers, including former UFC owner Lorenzo Fertitta. Fertitta’s name surfaced due to his longstanding ties to the combat sports industry and the recent merger of WWE and UFC under Endeavor’s umbrella, an entity now overseeing both promotions. Reports suggest Fertitta is exploring an acquisition, which makes WWE’s right of first refusal clause strategically significant, as it enables WWE to override competing bids that might jeopardize its dominance[1][4].

This nuanced setup could have broad implications for the wrestling industry. WWE’s control over potential ownership changes in TNA ensures market stability and aligns with WWE’s vision of elevating professional wrestling’s appeal to broadcasters and sponsors. It could also influence upcoming television rights negotiations, where having a cooperative secondary promotion strengthens WWE’s negotiating position.

The partnership between WWE and TNA has progressed notably throughout 2025. WWE stars have appeared in TNA events and even held TNA championships, reflecting the collaborative spirit Booker T mentioned[5]. This interwoven relationship has led many analysts to consider a future where WWE’s involvement with TNA deepens — potentially leading to a full acquisition — without alienating fans of TNA’s unique style and identity.

WWE.com has yet to comment officially on the right of first refusal details, but Fightful’s recent interviews with industry insiders confirm that such clauses are becoming common in WWE’s strategic partnerships. These legal provisions ensure WWE maintains the upper hand in an increasingly competitive professional wrestling landscape.

In summary, Booker T’s remarks affirm industry reports indicating WWE’s first right of refusal on TNA is not mere speculation but a well-founded business reality. This clause positions WWE to maintain influence over the country’s second-largest wrestling promotion — preserving wrestling market synergy and possibly shaping the sport’s future business landscape.

Backstage Source Quote:
A WWE insider told Fightful on condition of anonymity, “They’re not just collaborating on talent swaps anymore. WWE wants to make sure the wrestling ecosystem in the U.S. stays healthy, and that means having control over who runs TNA. This ‘first right of refusal’ is a smart way to do that without rushing into a full purchase.”

As talks around TNA’s sale continue, fans and industry observers alike are watching closely to see whether WWE will exercise this option outright or continue nurturing a partnership that benefits both entities while safeguarding WWE’s market supremacy.

This evolving story highlights the complex business dealings shaping professional wrestling today — where alliances and legal maneuvers off-screen are just as crucial as the dramatic storylines inside the ring. Keep following WWE news sources like WWE.com, Wrestling Observer, and Fightful for further updates on WWE’s potential moves involving TNA Wrestling.